Submit Content | Post an Event | Ask a Question | Start a Conversation | Advertise With Us! Sign Up | Sign In | Help | About | Contact
HOME MESSAGEBOARD EVENTS DINING SHOPPING ART NIGHTLIFE DEVELOPMENT POLITICS TRANSIT SPORTS MUSIC FILM AUDIO VIDEO SUBSCRIBE SUBMIT

Strickland says 3C Corridor needs $250 Million

From wtte28.com:

Ohio governor says rail project needs $250M

Ohio Gov. Ted Strickland says the state could restore passenger rail service with $250 million in federal stimulus money. The governor also estimates it would cost $10 million a year to operate the service, less than 1 percent of Ohio’s $7.6 billion, two-year transportation budget. Strickland says the plan would create up to 6,000 construction jobs and other service-related jobs at train stations.

[Read More]

Share this article on:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Print this article!
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tumblr
Similar Posts:

26 Responses to “Strickland says 3C Corridor needs $250 Million”

Pages: [1] 2 »

  1. #1
    Core_Models Says:

    Apparently we should live in Porter, IN or Kalamazoo, MI if we want stimulus bucks spent for rail nice and easy like.  If only we could catch up with those booming metropoli…metropolises…hmm.

    http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2009/03/14/obama_boosts_amtrak_funding/?p1=Well_MostPop_Emailed7

  2. #2
    Rocknrolloutlaws Says:

    Heh…Porter, IN…

    If it was a choice between not having rail service and living in Porter, IN I’d be willing to forgo the trains. (and I really really really want to see better rail.)

  3. #3
    catnfiddle Says:

    It’s a LOT less money than is being dumped into that relatively tiny 70 / 71 split, so what’s the problem?

  4. #4
    columbusdreamer Says:

    Is there a pay pal account for donations yet

  5. #5
    Brant Jones Says:

    Yeah, compared to the numbers that have been tossed around for the 70/71 split and the High St. streetcar, $250 million doesn’t sound like much money for a project this big.

  6. #6
    LauraA Says:

    passenger rail in a heartbeat! i rarely drive the 70/71 split.

  7. #7
    swampkitty Says:

    What’s wrong with the 70/71 Split? (yeah, I’m out of touch) I drive it all the time, have for years and years, and rarely does it have any major issues. 

    My vote goes to passenger rail.

  8. #8
    futureman Says:

    I hope this happens, just like everyone else here. I have my doubts, but will try to remain optimistic this time.

    I honestly don’t think 250 million is all that much for a transportation project. It also falls in line with shovel ready projects, the ability to create jobs and overall enhance the economy in Ohio.

    We are fortunate to have a governor who supports the 3C corridor!

  9. #9
    KMShay Says:

    If we are talking about “free” stimulus money being pumped into our local economy, I’d take $1.6B for Columbus over $250M for the State. 

    If the dollars are coming directly out of my pocket via local taxes, I’ll take neither.

  10. #10
    MikeReed Says:

    Rail!

    They should have to alot 1% for the arts like with public buildings.

  11. #11
    lifeontwowheels Says:

    I’m confused. Is the $250 mil actually the projected cost for the 3C to start up?

  12. #12
    Brant Jones Says:

    @lifeon That’s what it sounds like to me.

  13. #13
    Walker Says:

    KMShay Says: If we are talking about “free” stimulus money being pumped into our local economy, I’d take $1.6B for Columbus over $250M for the State.

    Just to clarify… the State of Ohio was granted $8.2 Billion in federal stimulus, and ODOT was granted $935M for highway project funding.

    What Strickland is requesting is an additional $250M out of the $8 billion federal pot for rail projects across the country.

    So from my understanding… if Ohio is not requesting any of that specific money for rail projects, it’s all going to simply go to other states’ rail projects. It’s not going to be used for anything else within our state.

  14. #14
    CbusIslander Says:

    Is this still being decided in the state senate?  When is the vote?  If everyone here wants rail, those are the people you need to call.  http://www.allaboardohio.org/cms/index.php

    If we don’t let them know, Ohio will never get this money.

  15. #15
    Urbanboi Says:

    I wanna ride the choo choo train!!

  16. #16
    Rockmastermike Says:

    I wish we could get that stupid 70/71 split “fix” killed and use that money to build the 3-c rail and an entire SYSTEM of streetcars/light rail in Columbus and we would probably still have some left over to re-pave something.

    Hell, I drive the “split” every day and it’s just not bad enough to make it worth sinking over 1.5 Billion bucks into “fixing” it. It’s not bad at all actually.

  17. #17
    KMShay Says:

    You may have seen this but it shows what has currently been approved broken down by state then municipality, project type, cost, jobs, popularity, etc.   http://www.stimuluswatch.org/
    Obviously this is stimulus dollars only.

    Does anyone have a link to the study on general public acceptance of the 3C project?  I’m sure they are out there.

  18. #18
    chivespa1 Says:

    I agree, I wish they’d kill the “fix”. No one in Columbus wants it because it is going to make downtown a disaster. Like all highway projects it will be a “if you build it they will come” solution. The more we invest in highways the more people will use them meaning that, in a few years we’ll be back asking for billions to “fix” it again. Instead we could invest in rail which is way more sustainable and way less expensive than personal auto traffic.

    As Walker explained this isn’t exactly an either/or situation but money is money and we will all end up paying this money back one way or another.

  19. #19
    lifeontwowheels Says:

    Didn’t Nashville build a 20-30 mile commuter rail system on 40-50 million using used rolling stock?

    Following that model a billion would go a long way here.

  20. #20
    Mercurius Says:

    CbusIslander Says: “Is this still being decided in the state senate?  When is the vote? “

    It is being debated in the State Senate right now.  Currently H.B. 2 was voted out of the House of Reps. on partisan lines with passenger rail in it.  Amendments to H.B. 2 are due to Chairman Patton’s office by Monday at noon. The next committee meeting is Tuesday.

  21. #21
    Mercurius Says:

    Walker, In addition to the $8 billion available from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act there is an additional $1.3 billion available from the Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act, so there is a total of $9.3 billion.

  22. #22
    Mercurius Says:

    KMShay: The best study to date on the project is this

    http://www.dot.state.oh.us/Divisions/Rail/Programs/passenger/Pages/OhioHubOverview.aspx

    It is woefully inadequate and the stats are old.  Ohio just commissioned a new study from Woodside Consultants that is due by August.

  23. #23
    karlbenz Says:

    “Didn’t Nashville build a 20-30 mile commuter rail system on 40-50 million using used rolling stock?”

    900 rides a day are taken on that line. Assuming most users purchase a round trip, only 450 people a day actually use the line. Coulda done better.

  24. #24
    Walker Says:

    The ridership of the Nashville Music City Star may seem low, but it was built as a very limited suburban commuter. It runs from the burbs into downtown twice in the morning, and then runs from downtown to the burbs twice in the evening. Weekdays only. That’s a total of 10 round-trips per week that this line makes.

    The train has a seating capacity of 750 passengers, which means that the maximum ridership it can handle is around 3000 rides per day. (Or 1500 round-trip riders per day.)

    So I’d say that an average of 900 rides per day on that particular system isn’t a bad average.

    Still, I don’t think it’s good model either for a suburban Columbus Light Rail line, or for the 3C Corridor unless we’re really looking to do things in a very limited capacity on a very shoestring budget.

  25. #25
    Mercurius Says:

    They are predicting an initial ridership of the 3C route to be 1,400 riders a day.

Pages: [1] 2 »

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.