I think that this is not as much of a question of who is a cyclist or who is a motorist, but more of a matter of choosing whether or not you wish to rely on oil to get around. Personally, I wanted to rely less heavily on cars for transportation, so I had to actively centralize my life in order to facilitate that. I'm not a badass that can bike 10 miles to work and march in the office wrinkle-free and flawless, but I can handle a few miles. So, I make sure I live, work, and play in the same area. I've had to give up a high-paying job and perhaps pay a bit more in rent, but that is important to me. Also, some smaller changes were necessary: combining errands that you need a vehicle for, more frequent grocery shopping to facilitate carrying your goodies on a bike, etc.
I own a car that barely works, but it gets me around when the weather is bad or I have to haul things/other people around. It usually sits idle 6 days of the week. My boyfriend also drives us around a bit, so to say that I live auto-free is a misnomer, but I would not classify myself as a motorist. I bike, walk, and ride the COTA for 85% of my trips. If Columbus took greater strides in the public transit and urban living arenas, I bet that percentage would increase for many, including myself. I am thankful for the provisions that ARE there that allow me to live my life fairly close to my ideal.
I grew up in a fairly rural area where a 20 minute drive was "close", and a 40 minute drive wasn't that bad. Now, having lived this way, I can't even fathom 30 minute commutes or having to drive to get a pack of cigarettes.