i'm curious why the official against argument is allowed to outright lie. they are stating that they'll only pay taxes on 33% of profits. it's really 33% of GROSS revenues minus winnings paid out. but that's very different from what the profits as a company will be after labor and huge overhead costs.
"Ohio would be forced to offer games approved in the future by Michigan, West Virginia, Indiana or Pennsylvania."
this is a little dramatic. it just says that if a casino in one of those states offers it, then ohio can too. in other words, it will keep ohio casinos competitive with every state which borders us.
"It pre-empts most local and state laws, including zoning laws."
how can a constitutional amendment pre-empt the law when the constitution is the highest law in ohio?