The reason there are only a few new developments going on now (it was all the rage when several developments were occurring) is due to what I stated before and that is developers not understanding how to make their development work in an urban context. We all know that much of Downtown just outside of Capitol Square is parking lots with nothing else nearby. They did not capitalize by all building in one small area of Downtown with great potential (Gay & High area) to create energy that would benefit all of them. We could have filled in that lot off of that intersection on High with numerous condos w/retail to help revitalize that empty stretch of High St making it and Gay St a great duo. Unfortunately, the city is to have some blame since they offered developers incentives to build anywhere Downtown without pointing them to the best locations. Developers obviously could have used the advice. Unlike the burbs, you can't just plop a condo in the middle of nowhere, expect people to gobble it up, and see lots of other development sprout up around it. Doesn't work that way. If you're buying in an urban location you want urban amenities and much of Downtown lacks these.
I've touched upon the effects of the "Cars are king" layout that exists in much of Downtown in other threads relevant to developments (lower property values, etc). In this case I hope the city learned that developers want calmed, two-way streets. Without Edwards and Lifestyles, Gay and Front would never be converted to two-way streets. The city needs to be proactive in providing a network of these which connects to neighborhoods bordering Downtown, or at least up to the highway barrier between them. I'll have to DVR this when it's on TV.
edit: Any graph with the number of Downtown residents starting in the year when they started this effort? It almost doubled awhile ago to 5,500 being the highest figure, but I have seen a new figure for quite some time. Oh well, we only need 5,500 more (residents, not empty units) to reach critical mass by 2012, but unfortunately, I don't remember where that figure is from and it may not be a very conservative estimate. In any case, it would certainly not result in all of Downtown being a lively place, only a smaller, but sizeable fraction.