nexttuesday wrote >>
I agree that if if that 5% makes a big difference to you, then you shouldn't be eating out. Also, if servers make more than you, you probably shouldn't be eating out very often, or you should go back to serving.
I've been a server, and I often felt entitled to more than 15%. Probably because I often got more than 15%. If people often tip you a certain percentage, you begin to think that's the type of service you provide and the type of tip you deserve. So when some people give you less, you feel slighted.
If you want to leave 15% all the time, that's your right. I don't think you can justify it by saying they've already gotten a raise more than the rest of America however. Just because prices increase on the menu doesn't mean more money is going into their pockets. Business is down in restaurants, so there are less jobs for servers and less tips overall. It doesn't matter if everyone leaves you 25% if you only have half the tables.
To clarify: I'm not advocating for 15% tips, nor am I trying to justify low tipping, nor am I complaining that servers earn more than I do, nor do I eat out if/where I can't afford to, nor do I tip below 20% when I do, nor am I griping about tipping a few extra bucks.
When I worked as a server, I just assumed that 15% meant "OK, you did the basics" and 20% meant "good job." Anything above that meant that I did something extra special for the table, or they were really wealthy/generous. My question, though, is how 20% came to mean what 15% used to mean, etc. Is it really a matter of simple math?
The economics of eating out have shifted since I was younger, and it seems like several industries now rely on their customers to determine and/or subsidize employee wages, such as "tip jars" at coffee shops.