^I'd say overannexation started during Mayor Sensenbrenner's first term in the '50s and had been "just the way things are done" basically until a few years ago. The theory behind it was to keep Columbus from being completely dominated by suburban interests that were starting to form at that time. It was a very forward-thinking strategy but it resulted in the maladies you describe. People didn't envision suburban-style development becoming a drain on finances at that time. I sure don't have a fix for it.
Columbus Underground Messageboard » General Columbus Discussion
Suburban America: Problems and Promise
[22 posts] [9 contributors]
Topic Rating:
(Total Ratings: )
Rate this topic:





Rate this topic:
-
Posted 8 months ago #
-
Over-annexation definitely has it's share of problems today.
Under-annexation would have left us with a completely different set of problems (much smaller population & smaller tax base).
Posted 8 months ago #
You must log in to post.



Launched in August 2010, TheMetropreneur.com is a local online resource devoted to small business development and entrepreneurship. Its aim is to tell the stories of Central Ohio's business community, foster regional economic development and assist entrepreneurs with its resource-heavy focus.