lifeliberty said:
This is what I feel the problem is too. It is not haves vs have not issue, or that no one wants to see the homelss, that is ridiculous! I'm at the point to where it is getting that I liked it better before the paper came about. i think it is a great idea and concept, don't get me wrong, I just think the market is saturated right now.
I think we need to remember that Street Speech didn't create the homeless population. It's likely that each of those people you pass selling the paper would still be asking you for money without the paper, they just wouldn't be offering you a product in exchange.
In addition, I don't think the paper was ever conceived as a lifetime job for anyone. Part of the hope is that people will gain some entrepreneurial skills, as well as have an incentive to stay sober and responsible, and eventually find some different career.
@Rivet - If the men wouldn't show a badge, they aren't authorized to sell Street Speech, period. Even a legitimate vendor who loses the badge is not allowed to sell. That policy is printed in each issue, along with a firm request to never purchase a paper from a vendor without a badge.
Other than that, I'm not sure what other options Street Speech actually has in terms of dealing with outside people who somehow get their hands on issues and try to sell them. Their main disciplinary measure is to rescind the badges of people who violate the behavioral code.