Let me start by saying that I am not looking to start a fight by this. I am honestly looking for a well thought out answers as I have been not had the time to fully research both sides to date.
Please explain to me how raising the tax rate on the super-wealthy, mainly on Capital Gains, is unfair and in some way means the rich are paying more than their “fair share” of the tax burden? True, the rich would pay a higher dollar amount (they make more too) but is it really unfair to ask the wealth to pay the same percentage of the income and capital gains to taxes that I pay? Maybe it’s the Capital Gains tax that has so many in an uproar but the mega-wealthy make a large part, if not most, of their income through investments and interest not true work income, thus capital gains needs to be in play. The right-wing talking heads seem to be saying pushing the dollar amount being higher somehow equates to justification of a lower percentage. Can you explain how that’s “fair”?
Also, I would like your feelings on incorporating a Flat Tax policy. It seems to me that if EVERYONE paid lets say 15% on income and capital gains (I am referring to personal taxes not corporate tax per se) and eliminate the variety of loop holes and deductions, MOST people would get a major tax cut and probably wipe out a good share of the debt with little other changes.
Keep in mind, I am VERY far from an expert on these things, so that is why I would like some insight from the more informed readers here.




Launched in August 2010, TheMetropreneur.com is a local online resource devoted to small business development and entrepreneurship. Its aim is to tell the stories of Central Ohio's business community, foster regional economic development and assist entrepreneurs with its resource-heavy focus.