So here is the lead spokesperson for ODOT clearly utilizing outdated data from 1999-2002 in this interview with Outlook.
Scott Varner, Deputy Director and lead spokesperson for ODOT, sat down to talk with outlook:columbus about the project, and ODOT’s new mission to “heal scars†left by the interstates in the Columbus neighborhoods.
“The 70/71 corridor carries 175,000 vehicles per day. With an accident rate 10 times the state average for similar sections of interstate, contributing to 1200 crashes every year on average,†explains Scott.
http://outlookcolumbus.com/2010/07/odot-seeks-to-heal-scars-left-behind-july-2010/
The 175,000 vehicles per day is from this 2002 document and even then this number was false. Why? Because a downtown stretch of I-670 was also closed from 3/30/02 through the rest of the year. This number includes a large amount of vehicles rerouted off of I-670 that overburdened the split. But let's not mention that totally irrelevant info.
http://www.dot.state.oh.us/projects/7071/Study/PublishingImages/MapsandCharts/los.pdf
The 1200 crashes a year, or an average of 3 crashes a day, is an even older figure from 1999-2001.
http://www.dot.state.oh.us/projects/7071/Study/PublishingImages/MapsandCharts/Crash_Data.pdf
An ODOT rep was quoted in the Dispatch in 2009 citing an average of two crashes a day each year, not three.
http://www.dispatch.com/live/content/local_news/stories/2009/01/23/THEMERGE.ART_ART_01-23-09_A1_JBCLAC5.html?sid=101
This also coincides with the 800 crashes a year cited in the city of Columbus' Public Service Department page from 2010.
http://pubserv.ci.columbus.oh.us/transportation/Document_Library/PROJECTS/I-70_and_I-71_Corridor.pdf
We haven't spent a dime on split reconstruction and here we have a 33% drop or a 1/3 drop in the number of crashes on the split. Who knows how recent that number is, but regardless it's significantly lower. Did I also mention that according to Business First; "Several properties will lose parking spaces."
http://columbus.bizjournals.com/columbus/stories/2010/05/31/focus6.html?page=2
Is this important now?