Columbusite wrote >>
They don't have direction and no one is giving them direction. What's complicated about that?
Your two statements are wholly non-equivalent. This second statement has no racial implications and no value judgments, and seems to at least imply that providing directions for at-risk youth is a responsibility that we all share. In this, it is completely in line with my original post which also did not mention race, did not seek to assign blame, and was seeking constructive action.
Your other post had very different connotations. It used the term "thug", which is a coded statement in American discourse for young black males of the inner city, with additional implications of violence, intimidation and criminality. It is also a term used almost exclusively in dismissive constructions denying the target's humanity such as "these thugs are animals", "these thugs should all be locked up" and "these thugs deserve to be shot". Then you added the reference to "baggy pants", which I think everyone knows to be a fashion choice strongly identified with the black cultural movement of hip-hop. Finally, you followed up by blaming the parents and neighbors, which indicates that you're disclaiming any larger social responsibility for inner city conditions, and uninterested in exploring any ways in which you might personally improve the situation.
You can track homocides by temperature in most cities.
While I'm absolutely sure this is true, there's not much we can do about the weather. Maybe we should see what the cities where homicide doesn't go up with the temperature are doing differently.