MatthewJR30 wrote I'm a little slow at this as well, I use Dreamweaver. Just out of curiousity, whats wrong with tables besides being old fashioned?
as brothermarcus said, nothing is really wrong with it. in tigertree's case, it doesn't seem necessary. however, there are some advantages of tableless layouts:
Pros and Cons
* Tables-based layouts
o Pro: Some people are used to working with tables-based layouts.
o Pro: Older web editors, such as Microsoft FrontPage, display tables-based layouts better in the design editor view.
o Con: Tables are no longer recommended for layout by current web standards.
o Con: Tables-based layouts can be less optimized for search engines.
o Con: Tables-based layouts often involve more code and increase bandwidth.
o Con: Tables-based layouts do not allow for global design updates the way CSS does.
* CSS layouts
o Pro: CSS layouts are recommended by current web standards.
o Pro: Because the layout definitions are centralized in a stylesheet, global design changes are easier to make.
o Pro: By separating the layout and design from the actual content of a page, the page code can be more optimized for search engines.
o Pro: CSS layouts usually result in more streamlined code, decreasing bandwidth.
o Con: Some older editors such as Microsoft FrontPage do not display CSS layouts properly in the Design View. While it is still possible to work with older editors, the user will have to get used to working in Split View and refreshing frequently in a browser instead of depending on the Design preview.
o Con: As with any technology, there is a learning curve for CSS. Developers who are used to using tables may not want to invest the time to switch over to CSS.
copied from
HERE
the biggest advantage tigertree would see from tableless layouts is that a full site redesign could be accomplished just by changing 1 file (the CSS file for the site).