Rockmastermike wrote If people are worried about their pets, please keep them supervised when outside. It's a dangerous world for pets anyway even if the coyotes don't get them, some dumbass in a car will.
This was a constant worry out in the country, but people let (or kept) their pets outside anyway. It did mean the occasional cat or dog got hit by a car, but it happened a lot less often than you might think. Both of our cats were outdoor cats; both died of old age.
I agree. I never have liked cats much
The devil is building a special chamber in Hell for you, right next to the ones for those who leave their cell phones on and actually answer them at the movie theater and poisonously saccharin summer camp counselors.
KSquared wrote I agree Rockmaster. Wiping out all other predators isn't healthy for the ecosystem, as we can see when the deer population explodes. It's all about balance ...
There's no help for it, sooner or later. I believe this part of the article got omitted from the quote here:
Coyotes migrated to Ohio from the West and have thrived in a state where they have no natural predators.
(Emphasis added.)
In other words, even if the overriding consideration is balance, not extermination, we're still going to end up killing at least some; the difference is between "some" (i.e., treating a certain population level as a good thing) and "as many as possible, hopefully all" (i.e., treating it like the ash borer or other pests). Importing other natural predators to keep the coyote population down is likely not going to be a serious option: coyotes' natural predators include alligators, wolves, cougars, and mountain lions. It would be hard to support any stable population of alligators in Ohio; cougars and mountain lions would simply never attain the required numbers. Wolves would be a solution worse than the problem.