Coreroc wrote >>
What I think you don't have these days is the sense of the people that simply didn't understand what it meant to be indie and couldn't understand why there wasn't some large group in charge of this independent art scene and thank god!
I never wished for any large organization, and I respect people's efforts to maintain the integrity of "Indie", but I will freely admit that I ended up feeling both confused and disappointed by the whole (concept? movement? experience?) after initially being very excited and enthused. I still don't understand "indie" and would be glad to have it explained to me.
One thing I remember is that the concept was patterned after Austin's "Live Music Capital of the World" brand. But Austin was able to capitalize on their concept with SXSW. The synergy between their concept and their event has dramatically raised their profile in the nation. At one time I saw Austin and Columbus as direct rivals, advantage Columbus, but even a dedicated Columbus fan like me has to admit Austin has decisively won the PR race in the last couple of years.
I'm still an Indie Columbus far (note my location) but it really started to seem to me --and I'm really not trying to be negative or point fingers here --that people saw "indie" as antithetical to any efforts to channel the energy behind the concept into any productive activity (such as was done in Austin).
But maybe it changed some locals' image of the city for the better, which definitely is important in itself. It was certainly fun while the initial high lasted...