johnwirtz wrote >>
lifeontwowheels wrote >>
johnwirtz wrote >>
I'm not sure the Dispatch gave us the full story. The Transportation and Pedestrian Commission Agenda has more details. It sounds to me like they will make some effort to allow cyclists to stay on westbound Broad Street. I'm still not sure why they are bothering with the detour.
It was a compromise to allow some parking. To allow parking, they had to end the bike lane for the 3 blocks and offer an alternative.
My point is that the compromise isn't useful. To allow parking, they had to end the bike lane, but they didn't have to offer the detour. Westbound cyclists can just stay on Broad for three blocks in the wide outside lane, which I expect almost all will do due to the extra length imposed by the detour.
John that was the point which was made in the meeting. I'm not sure if it is in writing anywhere, I have bike lane fatigue at this point. Experienced cyclists will use the 14' wide parking lane, meters will be installed to curb the unnecessary use of those lanes by folks who park all day, and it should generally be enough to satisfy everyone. The new hilltop connector will be coming down Eureka, and another line will be installed on Hague into Valleyview, so this offshoot will actually serve all 3 and may help direct people back to Broad from the connector, or not.
The residents up here would like to see the parking maintained all the way down with the 14' lane. I realize there isn't a lot of need now, but none of us can see the future.
On a side note, I am personally in touch with one owner who is renovating a building at Harris and Broad. Guess what their number one obstacle has been with the city when it comes to zoning? Parking. They have spoken about buying up and tearing down houses, but several houses nearby happen to be Sears & Roebuck kit houses which I'd personally like to see saved.