ToddAnders said:
Ok, Walker, I'm going to call bs on that response.
I knew you would. Give me a towel to wipe the shock off my face.





ToddAnders said:
Ok, Walker, I'm going to call bs on that response. If you love it, own it. I could spend hours going through all the public transit topics on the form and 90% of them are pro transit and the public financing of them. To say it's the same as who loves the local organic natural pig butt wrap does not make sense to me.You obviously want to use your voice to move forward a public financed transit system;
+10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
i wonder if the writer of that editorial saw this
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-501363_162-57468035/california-high-speed-rail-gets-green-light/
Towel given; so I can only assume my assessment was correct. Just own it, unless you believe that looking unbiased helps further the cause.
I totally own that in my own opinion, I am an advocate for passenger rail systems.
I'm saying that CU as a whole is made up of diverse opinion on the topic.
You post on CU, therefore you are a part of CU, therefore your opinion is one of the many.
The Dispatch editorial is an embarrassment.
It reads as if it was penned by a member of the Kasich Administration or the Romney campaign.
There is no indication that critical thought went into the piece, only partisanship; there is no hint of nuance, only rancor; there is no depth or consideration to the complexities that led to the situation in California, only an assumption presented as infallible that what happened in California would have happened here, and that Governor Kasich predicted it while Governor Strickland and President Obama are only interested in creating debt.
This in-kind donation to the Kasich/Romney Campaign would cost how much as an advertisement?
@ walker, love it.
ToddAnders said:
CU is irritated at an anti rail project? Give me a towel to wipe the shock off my face.
Does the operation of CU mean it's conscious and has a purpose? CU does not have feelings of which I know. Nor does it have an editorial board.
CU is actually the first computer program to become self-aware.
Right; my point was that Walker and many vocal contributors to CU are generally pro-rail. Simply calling a spade a spade.
ToddAnders said:
Right; my point was that Walker and many vocal contributors to CU are generally pro-rail. Simply calling a spade a spade.
No, you said CU as a whole was irritated, which I corrected you on to say that there are some people here who are proponents of rail transit, and others who do not support rail transit. Your original blanket statement was false.
I've never denied that I personally am a support of public transit of all types, including rail. For you to reiterate the fact is more of stating the obvious rather than calling anything spades.
OK?
The dog pack mentality is SO tiring sometimes.
No drama, that would go into the all opinions matter category.
Ohio Needs a Governor, Not an Ideologue
12 OCTOBER 2012

The New York Times carried an excellent article this weekend about how the GOP became the anti-city party. The point was, actually, that waging a culture war against urban areas–where 80 percent of the country lives–might not be such a smart move, even from a purely political stance. The party’s 2012 platform makes almost no mention of cities, outside of the usual dog-whistling. The Times estimates that Mitt Romney’s chances of winning this election are 15 percent.
READ MORE: http://rustwire.com/2012/10/12/ohio-needs-a-governor-not-an-ideologue/
You must log in to post.