Transit| Published on April 1, 2008 12:14 pm

COTA willing to run streetcars, sees benefits

By: ladyryokomuyo


The Dispatch wrote COTA willing to run streetcars, sees benefits

Tuesday, April 1, 2008

BY TIM DOULIN

COTA is willing to operate and maintain the streetcar system if it is built, said William Lhota, COTA’s president and chief executive. COTA has talked with the city, he said. “I think it is a positive because it further ensures it will be seamlessly integrated into the COTA system,” Lhota said.

COTA is a “strong possibility” to operate the streetcar system, “but we haven’t made a decision yet,” said Antone White, a spokesman for Mayor Michael B. Coleman. For one thing, the City Council must decide whether to give the go-ahead for the streetcar line. That decision is expected this year.

READ MORE

28 Comments

  • Walker wrote It’s been hinted at for a long time and I think it makes the most sense to have them manage the operations of it.

    Does this mean that streetcars are never allowed to run past 6:30 p.m.?

    Will they be allowed to arrive at stops at times posted on a schedule?

    Will they be able to run more frequently than every 45 mintes?

  • Andrew Hall wrote See my post in the other streetcar thread about potential incarnations of the streetcar being worse than the status quo …

    COTA wants its grubbies in the nice, lush, hot streetcar pie. Streetcars will come in spite of COTA and COTA should not be rewarded for decades of malfeasance.

    A.

    THANK YOU!

  • So, to summarize:

    The biggest argument in favor of COTA is efficiency.

    The biggest argument against COTA is COTA.

    :(

  • Brewmaster wrote With competitive bidding, wouldn’t you run the risk of pi$$ing off COTA if they don’t win? Maybe that’s not a bad thing, but having two transit agencies fighting each other probably wouldn’t serve the public interest.

    I’m usually a fan of competition, but transit agencies are a different animal. You don’t want COTA trying to put the streetcar agency out of business.

    When streetcars used to run the streets of Columbus, there were multiple private companies operating lines in Downtown and elsewhere.

    The lines that went out to the suburbs were developed/operated by developers trying to get residents to move to a certain area. The seling point was that someone could live outside the city and get Downtown right quick.

    These lines also synched up with national heavy-rail systems that were popular when that form of travel was super common.

  • jpunkster wrote I’m still too angry at COTA to digest this – Listening to Bill Lhota introduce himself at the streetcar meeting last week and talk about the high price of gas that he noticed as he was driving into work from Licking County really got my goat, what irony! Anyone else think a stipulation of running COTA should be that you have to live on a line or try taking one of the few park & ride routes into the office?

    I don’t know if that’s irony — but it’s totally shitty. I don’t trust that guy. It’s like the old rule that you should never visit a doctor with dying window plants.

  • I’m not sure if I’m more irritated that the guy running COTA just “happened to notice” high gas prices on his commute…as I would think that would be something he’d try and keep up with…

    or that he’s commuting that much of a distance and not riding his own service.

    either way, I’m peeved LOL

  • Coremodels wrote I’m not sure if I’m more irritated that the guy running COTA just “happened to notice” high gas prices on his commute…as I would think that would be something he’d try and keep up with…

    or that he’s commuting that much of a distance and not riding his own service.

    either way, I’m peeved LOL

    I guess I’m not shocked, and therefore not pissed. How many CEOs of large Columbus organizations do you think ride COTA? Does the CEO of Walmart buy his clothes and furniture there? I don’t think jobs should have residency restrictions.

  • gramarye wrote So, to summarize:

    The biggest argument in favor of COTA is efficiency.

    The biggest argument against COTA is COTA.

    :(

    Assuming COTA would be more efficient, they shouldn’t have trouble coming in with the lowest bid, right?

    COTA would probably do fine, but I think we should give private companies (example: First Transit) a chance to bid too. Maybe a private operator would do such a great job that we would want to privatize other bus routes. Maybe they wouldn’t and we could terminate their contract.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.