RSS
Twitter
Facebook
YouTubeThe Dispatch wrote
COTA willing to run streetcars, sees benefits
Tuesday, April 1, 2008
BY TIM DOULIN
COTA is willing to operate and maintain the streetcar system if it is built, said William Lhota, COTA’s president and chief executive. COTA has talked with the city, he said. “I think it is a positive because it further ensures it will be seamlessly integrated into the COTA system,” Lhota said.
COTA is a “strong possibility” to operate the streetcar system, “but we haven’t made a decision yet,” said Antone White, a spokesman for Mayor Michael B. Coleman. For one thing, the City Council must decide whether to give the go-ahead for the streetcar line. That decision is expected this year.
Comments
- leftovers: It seems odd that people are so polarized by another record store moving in
- farmerhaley: While I am not a big fan of several parts of the farm bill I understand the
- Timeone: htt
- chadshepherd: So this place will be a boutique, basically?? Barely a mention of music in
- leftovers: That is a killer name.
Top Stories
- ODOT Seeks Feedback on Downtown Bridge and Street Designs32
- Dublin Grows Upward: The Bridge Street Corridor Calls for Urban Development29
- Edwards Companies Converting Born Brewery Building into Apartments11
- At Home: In Harrison West10
- 89 Fish & Grill Opens Downtown10
- Oval Brewing Company Looking to Kickstart New Beer Business7
- Specials to Make Your Valentine's Day Special6
- Tomorrow's Antiques Opening Soon in The Short North6
- Columbus Ranked as 21st Most Lesbianish City in the US5
- Farm Bill Affects Ohio Food Systems3
Local Entrepreneurial News
- Camelot Cellars hosts unique events designed to support local charities
- CCAD MindShop incubator to help creatives succeed in business
- Ballroom at Oakhurst relaunches with help from Two Caterers
- Weiland’s Gourmet Market in business for more than 50 years
- Winners of 2011 TechColumbus Innovation Awards announced
COTA willing to run streetcars, sees benefits
By: ladyryokomuyo
Related Posts:
Um, yeah, that’s ok….
It’s been hinted at for a long time and I think it makes the most sense to have them manage the operations of it.
April Fools!
i think you’re right walker. that way at some date FAR in the future, when there are several street car lines and one popular light rail line, cota would already be well positioned to integrate logistics of both systems.
See my post in the other streetcar thread about potential incarnations of the streetcar being worse than the status quo …
COTA wants its grubbies in the nice, lush, hot streetcar pie. Streetcars will come in spite of COTA and COTA should not be rewarded for decades of malfeasance.
A.
COTA has experience (good and bad) with running a transit system.
Setting up a new operations entity to run the Streetcar doesn’t guarantee that they will perform better than COTA, and would probably be more costly.
My knowledge is fairly limited on the topic but it seems like the current administration at COTA has been doing fairly well at making some small improvements in the past two years (and more in the pipeline) and getting the whole thing turned around.
See my post in the other streetcar thread about potential incarnations of the streetcar being worse than the status quo …
COTA wants its grubbies in the nice, lush, hot streetcar pie. Streetcars will come in spite of COTA and COTA should not be rewarded for decades of malfeasance.
Agree, I would like to hear what are the alternatives to COTA
I also agree that it makes the most sense for COTA to run any future transit projects in columbus, and specifically, the new streetcar line.
Think of the logistics of two groups running transit. if you needed to ride a bus and a streetcar to get to your destination, you’d have to pay two fares rather than just getting a transfer from the driver. Having two sets of schedule and route information at each stop (if they would use the same stops) instead of just having one comprehensive list.
I’ve been using COTA since I sold my car in 2003, and I have to agree that its gotten much better in the past two years, and it stands to get only better with the tax increase that was approved last year.
Also, I don’t think Bill Lhota would have been sitting on the panel for the financing plan presentation if they didn’t intend for COTA to have some interaction with the project.
I don’t see why two different transit operators couldn’t integrate fares, schedules, and timetables on the street. If desired, COTA could do all the scheduling, but let someone else do the driving. Would someone else dirving be a benefit? I don’t know, but I think I like the idea of competitive bidding for the streetcar operations. I would support the same for bus operations, but I believe it is prohibited by union contract.
With competitive bidding, wouldn’t you run the risk of pi$$ing off COTA if they don’t win? Maybe that’s not a bad thing, but having two transit agencies fighting each other probably wouldn’t serve the public interest.
I’m usually a fan of competition, but transit agencies are a different animal. You don’t want COTA trying to put the streetcar agency out of business.
I’m usually a fan of competition, but transit agencies are a different animal. You don’t want COTA trying to put the streetcar agency out of business.
And there could be a significant cost savings in combined personnel and administration.
I’m usually a fan of competition, but transit agencies are a different animal. You don’t want COTA trying to put the streetcar agency out of business.
Sounds like the maintenance man in my condo. He does a crap job, but we pay him his bonus ever year anyway because we’re afraid that we’ll piss him off and he’ll do a worse job.
I can see the benefits to integration of the two services. It might even give COTA a competitive advantage in the bidding process. But I don’t see why it would be in COTA’s best interest to have the streetcar go out of business. Increasing the number of people using transit city-wide is in everyone’s best interest. What’s good for the streetcar is also good for COTA.
I found this APTA report from 1997. It seems that Scandinavian countries have experienced lower unit operating costs, improved quality of the bus fleet, and improved customer satisfaction following competitive bidding. They make a mention that US cities have experienced cost savings, but less consistent quality improvements. I’d like to do more research on the US experience. I’m sure there’s plenty of evidence saying competitive bidding is a disaster too.
I’m still too angry at COTA to digest this – Listening to Bill Lhota introduce himself at the streetcar meeting last week and talk about the high price of gas that he noticed as he was driving into work from Licking County really got my goat, what irony! Anyone else think a stipulation of running COTA should be that you have to live on a line or try taking one of the few park & ride routes into the office?
Sort of like the head of Amtrak flying to Washington for an emergency meeting on the fate of Amtrak? :lol:
So the first paragraph of this article is no longer accurate?
Does anyone know what other cities that run multiple transit system concurrently are doing in this regard?
Most cities have no problems coordinating schedules, and to a lesser extent fares, between multiple agencies.
San Francisco is in the process of implementing the Translink Card, that will be good everywhere.
NYC has the MetroCard, that seems to be good on the MTA buses and subways, but not on the commuter rails or New Jersey Transit.
That’s pretty much the same as the situation in Chicago and DC. Chicago has a Chicago Card good on CTA and PACE, but not on Metra unless you purchase a Metra LinkUp or PlusBus sticker. DC has a SmarTrip card that is good on buses, but not commuter rail and is the only way to pay to park and ride at Metrorail stations.
Most cities have no problems coordinating schedules, and to a lesser extent fares, between multiple agencies.
San Francisco is in the process of implementing the Translink Card, that will be good everywhere.
NYC has the MetroCard, that seems to be good on the MTA buses and subways, but not on the commuter rails or New Jersey Transit.
That’s pretty much the same as the situation in Chicago and DC. Chicago has a Chicago Card good on CTA and PACE, but not on Metra unless you purchase a Metra LinkUp or PlusBus sticker. DC has a SmarTrip card that is good on buses, but not commuter rail and is the only way to pay to park and ride at Metrorail stations.
The thing is with those cities, the differing transit agencies are running dis-similar systems, i.e. bus/subway and commuter rail. The systems serve somewhat different purposes.
In Columbus’s case we’re talking about potentially having two separate agencies run two systems run essentially the same sort slow speed surface route. I think it would make the most sense to have COTA run the Streetcar, as it is mostly a fixed bus route.
If this were instead a commuter system I would say another transit agency might be in order.
Honestly, I’d be in favor of having one-stop shopping for everything up until you’re at the OhioHub level (which necessarily means coordinating with polities outside central Ohio). However, until you get outside the general area roughly corresponding to MORPC’s jurisdiction, I don’t see why completely separate agencies would be necessary. Possibly not even separate branches within one agency.
One agency might make the most sense. I looked through some streetcar/trolley websites and found that all are either operated by the local transit authority or by a non-profit city-owned development corp.
Streetcars operated by transit agencies
Charlotte
Kenosha
Little Rock
Memphis
Seattle
Tampa
Toronto
Streetcars operated by non-profit corporations
Dallas
Portland