Our City Online


Columbus Makes Its Pitch for $40 Million “Smart City” Grant

Brent Warren Brent Warren Columbus Makes Its Pitch for $40 Million “Smart City” GrantPhoto by Walker Evans.
Decrease Font Size Increase Font Size Text Size Print This Page

US Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx was in town yesterday to talk about the “Smart City Challenge,” a national competition that will award up to $40 million to the city judged to have the best ideas for utilizing technology to improve its transportation network.

Columbus was one of seven cities named as finalists for the award in March, and a broad range of business, community, and government leaders used the event — billed as a roundtable discussion with Foxx and Mayor Andrew Ginther and held at the Lincoln Theatre — to give their best pitches to the Secretary for why they think Columbus should be chosen when the winning city is picked later this summer.

Some spoke to the great need for more and better transportation options in the city, whether that’s for the seniors population, young adults, or for residents of neighborhoods like Linden — an area singled out for investment in the original Columbus Smart City application — where access to reliable and convenient transit is most needed.

Former Mayor Michael Coleman was one of many speakers to emphasize the track record of collaboration in the city. He touted the recent $30 million Choice Neighborhood Initiative grant — which is being used to build a mixed-income neighborhood on the site of the former Poindexter Village — and how that federal money was used to leverage an additional $200 million in public and private investment in the neighborhood.

“The same thing will happen with this award,” Coleman said. “We will stack hands… and it will impact Columbus dramatically.”

Ginther said that the goal of the Columbus proposal is to “help connect the disconnected,” and to be proactive in exploring how new technologies — like driverless cars — can be used to do so. He pointed out that when I-71 was built, it served to disconnect a thriving African American neighborhood on the east side from downtown.

Foxx agreed that “the history of transportation has not always been great when it comes to being as inclusive as possible, and I-71 is a good example.” He added that a central question being asked in the competition is, “what if we as a country thought about being inclusive at the beginning, and we built out systems around inclusive ideas?”

Foxx anticipates that the winning city will be the focus of a lot of attention.

“The world is watching this competition in a very interesting way,” he said. “There’s a conversation about smart cities but it’s for the most part kind of philosophical, and I think the difference between the global smart cities conversation and this competition is that this is a very practical, very brass tacks program… and you can fully expect, if you win this thing, that the spotlight of the world will be here.”

Foxx also stressed that the Department of Transportation will work with all of the applicant cities to try and match their ideas with other government funding streams, so that even those cities that do not win the final prize will likely be able to implement at least some of their ideas.

Asked after the program if there was anything that stood out about Columbus’ efforts in comparison to the other cities still in the running, Foxx said that he has been impressed with the city’s “collaborative spirit.”

“The degree to which the city is unearthing resources that are here,” he said, “both human resources as well as infrastructure, like the Ohio State University, which is very much involved… those partnerships will matter a lot when it comes to execution, so it’s very encouraging.”

Print Friendly


  • CB_downtowner

    The idea of building “final mile” smart transportation is a fantastic idea. And could be a very nice way to build ridership. One of the things that might be very unappealing about public transportation today is how far away a stop is.

    • Final Mile is a good idea, but what about the rest of the miles? I recognize that COTA has improved and continues to do so, but it’s not nearly enough. I can see two views on Columbus’ chances to win the competition. Against it may be the fact that it has, so far, failed to attempt very many forward-thinking ideas, including compared to cities it is competing against. It puts Columbus in a place where it must justify the investment in a city that hasn’t bothered to take the initiative on its own. On the other hand, perhaps a positive to that is that Columbus would truly be an experiment in which the true impact of such a grant can be more easily measured vs. a city that already has a ton of other options, or at the very least, is much further along the transit path.

  • Joshua Shadowhurst

    With 2,000 self driving cars, the city could sell passes on an income based sliding scale with a mean price of $100 a month. That would bring in $2M a month. We could employ 100 people to work in monitoring centers to charge fines for smoking or eating in the cars, watch for heart attacks, and alert authorities to any illegal behavior.

    Such a system could provide transportation to 200,000 people around the clock; increasing well-being from people better able to make it to doctors visits, jobs, libraries, grocery stories, and education. It would bring in more revenue for the city in the form of income tax, sales tax, and fines collected, as well as the subscription fees.

    with greater access to adult learning, this system could increase the number of people enrolled in university, decrease drunk driving–thereby decreasing accidents, and we’d have a safer, better educated, and more empowered populace. I think it should be done even if we DON’T get the grant! I can’t think of a more beneficial program for the city and her residents.

  • Joshua Shadowhurst

    *10 passes for each car at around $100 per pass would get $2M per month.

    • That’s a solid idea from a financial perspective, but I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s not enough to cover the entire cost of staff, maintenance, repairs, insurance, fuel (gas or electric). There would still likely need to be some subsidies. Which I’m personally ok with when it comes to transportation, because no mode of transit is self-funding.

  • [email protected]

    First step for improving COTA service: Discontinue the long established practice of busses driving past potential passengers waiting at bus stops without stopping. This would not require $40M from anywhere.

metro categories