Let’s clear something up first. Columbus will never be a world-renowned visual arts mecca. Artists will not flock to Columbus in hopes of making it. Wealthy patrons will not pluck Columbus artists from obscurity and make them superstars. Major publications will not shuttle critics through CMH to review local openings. Designers will not appropriate the Columbus style for t-shirts and advertisements. It just won’t happen.
I offer this courageous bit of prognostication not to be negative (though it may sound negative) and not to belittle the contributions of some of our nationally recognized artists and stakeholders (Thank You Ron Pizzuti, Les Wexner, Ann Hamilton, Elijah Pierce, Howard and Babs Sirak, Malcolm Cochran, Aminah Robinson, Sherri Gelden, and everyone else who’s helped put Columbus on the national art map). I offer these predictions to give us a sense of perspective.
Too often this idea that Columbus has to be world-class, big-time, and top-tier dissuades us from really appreciating the work of Columbus artists on its own merits. It creates a false dichotomy, inviting unnecessary and largely unhelpful comparisons; the kind of either-or fallacies that suggest you’re either New York or you’re nowhere, you’re either Damien Hirst or you’re nobody. Nothing could be further from the truth.
Columbus, thanks to some pioneering modernists, inspired outsiders, and a rich academic tradition, has been nurturing great artists and generating great art for over a century. As proof, I suggest visiting 100 Years of Art: Celebrating Columbus’ Legacy, currently on view at the Riffe Gallery. Here you’ll find an amazing selection of work by artists who, in one way or another, are connected with Columbus. It’s a collection of work that stands on its own, transcending comparisons and demonstrating that creativity and vision have little to do with name recognition or city of origin.
That’s not to say there aren’t some big names involved. George Bellows, Roy Lichtenstein, Alice Schille, Stanley Twardowicz, and even James Thurber are all featured in this exhibition. Also represented is the robust outsider heritage that runs through Columbus art. Works by Elijah Pierce, Grandpa Smoky Brown, William Hawkins, and Mary Merrill demonstrate that creativity and artistic vision are not limited to those with formal training.
Highlights for me included the chance to see two of Edna Boies Hopkins’ stunning prints. Purple Astors and Spotted Dahlia exemplify the vibrant, Japanese-inspired color woodblock prints Hopkins is most famous for. Hoyt Sherman’s Across to the Jemez and Lucius Kutchin’s Boy with Guitar – Sante Fe (Cowboy) show the modernist leanings of two of Columbus’ most highly regarded painters.
Melissa Wolfe, Curator of American Art at the Columbus Museum of Art, and The Ohio Arts Council are to be commended for putting together such a fine show. The extensive biographies accompanying the works provide context and connection. The breadth of styles demonstrate a willingness to embrace all manifestations of the visual arts. The inclusion of so many works from private collections makes this exhibition an especially rare treat. It’s unlikely we’ll have the chance to see these works together again, so take advantage of it. I’d encourage anyone interested in the history of Columbus and the artists who were part of it to enjoy 100 Years of Art. It’s a fitting tribute to our City’s Bicentennial Celebration and the perfect chance to remind ourselves that great art happens right here.
100 Years of Art: Celebrating Columbus’ Legacy is on view January 26th to April 15th 2012 at the Riffe Gallery.
Image credits:
William Hawkins
(1895-1990)
The Iguana, 1978-81
Enamel on Masonite with glitter, 33.5” x 51”
Columbus Museum of Art
Lucius Kutchin
(1901-1936)
Boy with Guitar – Santa Fe (Cowboy), 1936
Oil on composition board, 38″ x 29.25″
Columbus Museum of Art
Edna Boies Hopkins
(1872-1937)
Purple Astors, c. 1910
Color woodblock print, 10.75″ x 7.5″
Columbus Museum of Art





This is exciting, I didn’t know this show was going on. I’ll have to check it out.
I was just reflecting on some of the same things Jeff talks about in his first paragraph. And I think I’ve come to a happy place with it. Art is subjective, right? And it also seems that art might be a product of the surrounding culture, a part of it. Columbus isn’t a highly conceptual culture. We’re more literal and plain. Look at the land that surrounds us. Look at the people who live here. No-nonsense farmhouses, old barns, sere fields and gravel roads. We make from what we have, who we are, and who we have been. Hopefully, we make art for us. Not for New York. And if extraverted-and-fabulous New York or Paris sometimes notice the things made by this intoverted-and-plain midwestern city, that’s great. But hopefully they will notice them as representing our UNIQUE strengths– and not as the poor man’s copy of metropolitan-style art.
I think of James Thurber as a great example. Look at the landscape around us– modest and reliable. Endearing (everyone moves away from Ohio– but a large percentage of them move back, wonder why?). Look at Charles Burchfield. These are artists who I don’t think would have truly accessed their gifts were it not for our area. Witty, humble, unexpected, making world-class art out of where they were.
Not everwhere has to smell, taste, look, sound, and feel like major metropolises. Sometimes its better if it just feels like THIS place. Not to mention it’s very dated and provincial to assume that all smaller towns want to be like bigger towns. That’s so last century ;) Let’s have the cojones to be who we are.
Thanks Jeff for the great article!
Thanks for your thoughtful response Mandy. It really is a great exhibit. I hope you’ll get a chance to check it out.
Well written review, but Hirst is from uk. Haha
Thanks Zooky. Do you think the fact that Hirst is from the UK changes the meaning? If so, I’m afraid I didn’t make my point very well. I simply meant to provide an example of our tendency to focus on “superstar artists” and ignore everyone else. I could have just as easily picked Jeff Koons, Pablo Picasso, Claude Monet or Vincent Van Gogh. For whatever reason, I chose Damien Hirst.